The Air Force released 4 new opinions today, one of which had no assigned errors. In the other three cases, the court reached conclusions without explaining the facts. In other words, not worth reading. If the court isn't going to attach any facts to their conclusions, they ought to just cite to the cases and say affirmed.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
This blog focuses on military justice issues, especially as they relate to courts-martial, the service courts of criminal appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of any other entity.
Contributors
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(95)
-
▼
July
(28)
- Colonel Murphy 3
- Voir Dire Hypos
- Military Commission
- Moreno Redux 2
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Norbert MacLean
- CAAF Grants Petition
- Moreno Redux
- Extraordinary Writs
- Court of Military Commission Review
- Colonel Murphy 2
- AF TJAG Certifies an Issue
- Mil. R. Evid. 803(3)
- New Air Force Opinions
- Pretrial Confinement Revisited
- NMCCA Censures Judge, Again
- Air Force Releases 2 Opinions
- Missing Witnesses
- New AFCCA Cases
- Haditha Art. 32 Reports
- Abu Ghraib Trial
- Terminated by Apprehension
- Confrontation Clause Cases 2
- Where's My Inheritance?
- CAAF Oral Argument Schedule
- Navy Doctor to GCM
- Death Penalty Sought
- Charging Child Pornography
-
▼
July
(28)
Links
Powered by Blogger.
No comments:
Post a Comment